Normal gait speed by geographical location

A world map.

Normal gait speed by geographical location

A world map.

Physiotherapists in the USA reviewed observational studies of normal gait speed and stratified them by geographical region. The first author, Bill Andrews, agrees to answer questions about the review.

How much evidence did you find about normal or comfortable gait speed?

There are numerous articles published where researchers measured normal gait speed.

Using search terms for normative, gait and speed in addition to their synonyms, we found 1444 articles published in the past decade worthy of review.

However, we applied rather stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure that the methods employed across studies were comparable regarding key elements.

For example, we only included studies with untimed acceleration and deceleration phases since beginning timing from a static starting position may yield relatively slower gait speed values (Pasma et al 2014, Phan-Ba et al 2012).

After applying all our inclusion/exclusion criteria, we ended up with gait speed data from 38 articles published in the past decade that we could add to a database we established back in 2011.

The combined database used in our meta-analysis consisted of comfortable gait speeds obtained from 51,248 apparently healthy adults and stratified by sex and age (ie, 18–29, 30–39… 80+ years).

When you pooled the data, did normal gait speed vary with age and/or sex?

In concurrence with previous studies, gait speed decreased as age increased.

We found a steady decline in the mean gait speed for women with increasing age.

The mean gait speed for men remained stable from 18 to 29 years to 40 to 49 years and thereafter decreased with increasing age.

Overall, the mean gait speed ranged from a low of 97 cm/s for women aged 80+ years to a high of 140 cm/s for men aged 40–49 years.

Another interesting finding related to age was that older participants had wider confidence intervals for their gait speeds, indicating less homogeneity in the older age groups than in the younger age groups.

Even though all investigators required their participants to be independently ambulatory in the community, participants with comorbidities that may affect gait speed (eg, diabetes mellitus; Nilsson et al 2017) could have been included in some studies in this meta-analysis but not in others.

Since older adults are more likely to have comorbidities that may affect gait, this variance in exclusion criteria may have contributed to less homogeneity in the older age groups.

What about geographical region? Did that have an influence?

After stratifying the participants even further by the continents where the studies were conducted (Australia, Asia, Europe, North America and South America), we found that gait speeds between groups could not be analysed with an analysis of variance because assumptions of homoscedasticity were violated.

In other words, gait speed variances were greater in some sex/age groups than others, thus raising the risk of skewed statistical test results.

An observation of the results showed overlaps in gait speed confidence interval values for just about every sex/age group between continents.

We recommend that clinicians and researchers compare their patients, clients and participants to the table of comfortable gait speed for all participants, broken down by sex and age.

Breaking down gait speed normative values even further by geographic region is not useful with this data set.

>> Bill Andrews is a physiotherapist who serves as Professor in the Department of Physical Therapy Education at Elon University in North Carolina in the United States. His clinical, academic and research interest areas are clinical measurement and stroke rehabilitation.


1. J.K. Taylor, I.E. Buchan, S.N. van der Veer. Assessing life-space mobility for a more holistic view on wellbeing in geriatric research and clinical practice. Aging Clin Exp Res, 31 (2019), pp. 439-445.
2. S.E. Hardy, S. Perera, Y.F. Roumani, J.M. Chandler, S.A. Studenski. Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 55 (2007), pp. 1727-1734.
3. A. Middleton, S.L. Fritz, M. Lusardi. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act, 23 (2015), pp. 314-322
4. N.M. Salbach, K.K. O'Brien, D. Brooks, et al. Reference values for standardized tests of walking speed and distance: a systematic review. Gait Posture, 41 (2015), pp. 341-360
5. R.W. Bohannon, Y.C. Wang. Four-meter gait speed: normative values and reliability determined for adults participating in the NIH Toolbox Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 100 (2019), pp. 509-513
6. S. Gillain, M. Boutaayamou, N. Dardenne, et al. Data set of healthy old people assessed for three walking conditions using accelerometric and opto-electronic methods. Aging Clin Exp Res, 29 (2017), pp. 1201-1209
7. N. Herssens, E. Verbecque, A. Hallemans, L. Vereeck, V. Van Rompaey, W. Saeys. Do spatiotemporal parameters and gait variability differ across the lifespan of healthy adults? A systematic review. Gait Posture, 64 (2018), pp. 181-190
8. H. Kawai, Y. Taniguchi, S. Seino, et al. Reference values of gait parameters measured with a plantar pressure platform in community-dwelling older Japanese adults. Clin Interv Aging, 14 (2019), pp. 1265-1276
9. R.W. Bohannon, A.W. Andrews. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 97 (2011), pp. 182-189
10. R.F. Ritchie, G. Palomaki. Selecting clinically relevant populations for reference intervals. Clin Chem Lab Med, 42 (2004), pp. 702-709
11. E. Strauss, E.M. Sherman, O. Spreen. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)
12. D. Moher, L. Shamseer, M. Clarke, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev, 4 (2015), p. 1
13. J. Strang, S. Pilling, E. Albert, et al. Drug Misuse: Psychosocial Interventions. British Psychological Society, Leicester (UK) (2008)
14. J.H. Pasma, M. Stijntjes, S.S. Ou, G.J. Blauw, C.G. Meskers, A.B. Maier. Walking speed in elderly outpatients depends on the assessment method. Age (Dordr), 36 (2014), p. 9736
15. R. Phan-Ba, P. Calay, P. Grodent, et al. A corrected version of the Timed-25 Foot Walk Test with a dynamic start to capture the maximum ambulation speed in multiple sclerosis patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 30 (2012), pp. 261-266
16. J.L. Neyeloff, S.C. Fuchs, L.B. Moreira. Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes, 5 (2012), p. 52
17. M. Borenstein. Research Note: In a meta-analysis, the I2 index does not tell us how much the effect size varies across studies. J Physiother, 66 (2020), pp. 135-139
18. J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, D.G. Altman. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327 (2003), pp. 557-560
19. M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, R. HR. Introduction to Meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, UK (2009)
20. D. Jackson, R. Turner. Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods, 8 (2017), pp. 290-302
21. H.H.H. Adams, V.J.A. Verlinden, M.L. Callisaya, et al. Heritability and genome-wide association analyses of human gait suggest contribution of common variants. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 71 (2016), pp. 740-746
22. L. Alcock, T.D. O'Brien, N. Vanicek. Age-related changes in physical functioning: correlates between objective and self-reported outcomes. Physiotherapy, 101 (2015), pp. 204-213
23. S. Bailey, E. Bailey. Predictors of Health Related Quality of Life in Adults 50 Years and Older. J Nov Physiother, 6 (2016), p. 281
24. D.A. Bruening, R.E. Frimenko, C.D. Goodyear, D.R. Bowden, A.M. Fullenkamp. Sex differences in whole body gait kinematics at preferred speeds. Gait Posture, 41 (2015), pp. 540-545
25. M. Canney, D.J. Sexton, M.D. O'Connell, R.A. Kenny, M.A. Little, C.M. O'Seaghdha. Kidney function estimated from cystatin C, but not creatinine, is related to objective tsts of physical performance in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 72 (2017), pp. 1554-1560
26. H.Y. Chen, P.F. Tang. Factors contributing to single- and dual-task Timed “Up & Go” test performance in middle-aged and older adults who are active and dwell in the community. Phys Ther, 96 (2016), pp. 284-292
27. K.K. Chui, M.M. Lusardi. Spatial and temporal parameters of self-selected and fast walking speeds in healthy community-living adults aged 72-98 years. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 33 (2010), pp. 173-183
28. K. Crockett, S.A. Kontulainen, J.P. Farthing, et al. Differences in function and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with and without a recent distal radius fracture. J Aging Phys Act, 26 (2018), pp. 136-145
29. A. Elbaz, F. Artaud, A. Dugravot, C. Tzourio, A. Singh-Manoux. The gait speed advantage of taller stature is lost with age. Sci Rep, 8 (2018), p. 1485
30. J.E. Freund, D.M. Stetts, A. Oostindie, J. Shepherd, S. Vallabhajosula. Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test in healthy women 50-79 years old. J Women Aging, 31 (2019), pp. 475-491
31. A. Fryzowicz, M. Murawa, J. Kabacinski, A. Rzepnicka, L.B. Dworak. Reference values of spatiotemporal parameters, joint angles, ground reaction forces, and plantar pressure distribution during normal gait in young women. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 20 (2018), pp. 49-57
32. K.M. Goutier, S.L. Jansen, C.G. Horlings, U.M. Kung, J.H. Allum. The influence of walking speed and gender on trunk sway for the healthy young and older adults. Age Ageing, 39 (2010), pp. 647-650
33. V. Gunasekaran, J. Banerjee, S.N. Dwivedi, A.D. Upadhyay, P. Chatterjee, A.B. Dey. Normal gait speed, grip strength and thirty seconds chair stand test among older Indians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 67 (2016), pp. 171-178
34. J.H. Hollman, E.M. McDade, R.C. Petersen. Normative spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults. Gait Posture, 34 (2011), pp. 111-118
35. W. Kemmler, M. Teschler, S. Goisser, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in Germany and the corresponding effect of osteoarthritis in females 70 years and older living in the community: results of the FORMoSA study. Clin Interv Aging, 10 (2015), pp. 1565-1573
36. R.N. Kirkwood, H.A. Gomes, R.F. Sampaio, S.R. Furtado, B.S. Moreira. Spatiotemporal and variability gait data in community-dwelling elderly women from Brazil. Braz J Phys Ther, 20 (2016), pp. 258-266
37. R.N. Kirkwood, B. Moreira, S.A. Mingoti, B.F. Faria, R.F. Sampaoi, R.A. Resende. The slowing down phenomenon: What is the age of major gait velocity decline? Maturitas, 115 (2018), pp. 31-36
38. S.W. Lee, J. Verghese, R. Holtzer, J.R. Mahoney, M. Oh-Park. Trunk sway during walking among older adults: norms and correlation with gait velocity. Gait Posture, 40 (2014), pp. 676-681
39. N. Löfgren, A. Halvarsson, A. Ståhle, E. Franzén. Gait characteristics in older women with osteoporosis and fear of falling. Eur J Physiother, 15 (2013), pp. 139-145
40. N. Lythgo, C. Wilson, M. Galea. Basic gait and symmetry measures for primary school-aged children and young adults. II: walking at slow, free and fast speed. Gait Posture, 33 (2011), pp. 29-35
41. D. Malatesta, M. Canepa, A. Menendez Fernandez. The effect of treadmill and overground walking on preferred walking speed and gait kinematics in healthy, physically active older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol, 117 (2017), pp. 1833-1843
42. M.J. McKay, J.N. Baldwin, P. Ferreira, et al. Spatiotemporal and plantar pressure patterns of 1000 healthy individuals aged 3-101 years. Gait Posture, 58 (2017), pp. 78-87
43. A. Middleton, G.D. Fulk, M.W. Beets, T.M. Herter, S.L. Fritz. Self-selected walking speed is predictive of daily ambulatory activity in older adults. J Aging Phys Act, 24 (2016), pp. 214-222
44. A.G. Nilsson, D. Sundh, L. Johansson, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with better bone microarchitecture but lower bone material strength and poorer physical function in elderly women: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res, 32 (2017), pp. 1062-1071
45. R.D. Novaes, A.S. Miranda, V.Z. Dourado. Usual gait speed assessment in middle-aged and elderly Brazilian subjects. Rev Bras Fisioter, 15 (2011), pp. 117-122
46. M. Oh-Park, R. Holtzer, X. Xue, J. Verghese. Conventional and robust quantitative gait norms in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 58 (2010), pp. 1512-1518
47. C.R. Ruggero, T.L. Bilton, L.F. Teixeira, et al. Gait speed correlates in a multiracial population of community-dwelling older adults living in Brazil: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health, 13 (2013), p. 182
48. R.A.C. Sampaio, P.Y.S. Sampaio, L.A.A. Castano, et al. Cutoff values for appendicular skeletal muscle mass and strength in relation to fear of falling among Brazilian older adults: cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J, 135 (2017), pp. 434-443
49. S. Seino, S. Shinkai, Y. Fujiwara, et al. Reference values and age and sex differences in physical performance measures for community-dwelling older Japanese: a pooled analysis of six cohort studies. PLoS One, 9 (2014), Article e99487
50. D.K.A. Singh, R. Murukesu, S. Shahar, et al. Discriminative and predictive ability of physical performance measures in identifying fall risk among older adults. Sains Malaysiana, 47 (2018), pp. 2769-2776
51. V. Southard, A. Dave, P. Douris. Exploring the role of body mass index on balance reactions and gait in overweight sedentary middle-aged adults: a pilot study. J Prim Care Community Health, 1 (2010), pp. 178-183
52. Z. Svoboda, L. Bizovska, M. Janura, E. Kubonova, K. Janurova, N. Vuillerme. Variability of spatial temporal gait parameters and center of pressure displacements during gait in elderly fallers and nonfallers: a 6-month prospective study. PLoS One, 12 (2017), Article e0171997
53. T. Thaweewannakij, S. Wilaichit, R. Chuchot, et al. Reference values of physical performance in Thai elderly people who are functioning well and dwelling in the community. Phys Ther, 93 (2013), pp. 1312-1320
54. A.M. Turcato, M. Godi, A. Giordano, M. Schieppati, A. Nardone. The generation of centripetal force when walking in a circle: insight from the distribution of ground reaction forces recorded by plantar insoles. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 12 (2015), p. 4
55. S. Vallabhajosula, S.K. Humphrey, A.J. Cook, J.E. Freund. Concurrent validity of the Zeno Walkway for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 42 (2019), pp. E42-E50
56. J. Waanders, C. Beijersbergen, A. Murgia, T. Hortobagyi. Functional relevance of relative maintenance of maximal eccentric quadriceps torque in healthy old adults. Gerontology, 62 (2016), pp. 588-596
57. O. Beauchet, G. Allali, H. Sekhon, et al. Guidelines for assessment of gait and reference values for spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults: the Biomathics and Canadian Gait Consortiums Initiative. Front Hum Neurosci, 11 (2017), p. 353
58. M.J. Bendall, E.J. Bassey, M.B. Pearson. Factors affecting walking speed of elderly people. Age Ageing, 18 (1989), pp. 327-332




© Copyright 2018 by Australian Physiotherapy Association. All rights reserved.